[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201005223635.2922805-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 15:36:32 -0700
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...gle.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] scsi: ufs: atomic update for clkgating_enable
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...gle.com>
When giving a stress test which enables/disables clkgating, we hit device
timeout sometimes. This patch avoids subtle racy condition to address it.
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Cc: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
Cc: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...gle.com>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 1d157ff58d817..d929c3d1e58cc 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -1791,19 +1791,19 @@ static ssize_t ufshcd_clkgate_enable_store(struct device *dev,
return -EINVAL;
value = !!value;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
if (value == hba->clk_gating.is_enabled)
goto out;
- if (value) {
- ufshcd_release(hba);
- } else {
- spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
+ if (value)
+ hba->clk_gating.active_reqs--;
+ else
hba->clk_gating.active_reqs++;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
- }
hba->clk_gating.is_enabled = value;
out:
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
return count;
}
--
2.28.0.806.g8561365e88-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists