linux-kernel - [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Tweak pick_next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 05 Oct 2020 07:43:21 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Peter Oskolkov" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guitttot@...aro.org>,
        x86 <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Tweak pick_next_entity()

The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     9abb897345ce1d41257567f571a78137c961c405
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/9abb897345ce1d41257567f571a78137c961c405
Author:        Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>
AuthorDate:    Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:35:32 -07:00
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 16:30:52 +02:00

sched/fair: Tweak pick_next_entity()

Currently, pick_next_entity(...) has the following structure
(simplified):

  [...]
  if (last_buddy_ok())
    result = last_buddy;
  if (next_buddy_ok())
    result = next_buddy;
  [...]

The intended behavior is to prefer next buddy over last buddy;
the current code somewhat obfuscates this, and also wastes
cycles checking the last buddy when eventually the next buddy is
picked up.

So this patch refactors two 'ifs' above into

  [...]
  if (next_buddy_ok())
      result = next_buddy;
  else if (last_buddy_ok())
      result = last_buddy;
  [...]

Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guitttot@...aro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200930173532.1069092-1-posk@google.com
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index fc3410b..cec6cf9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4465,17 +4465,17 @@ pick_next_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
 			se = second;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * Prefer last buddy, try to return the CPU to a preempted task.
-	 */
-	if (cfs_rq->last && wakeup_preempt_entity(cfs_rq->last, left) < 1)
-		se = cfs_rq->last;
-
-	/*
-	 * Someone really wants this to run. If it's not unfair, run it.
-	 */
-	if (cfs_rq->next && wakeup_preempt_entity(cfs_rq->next, left) < 1)
+	if (cfs_rq->next && wakeup_preempt_entity(cfs_rq->next, left) < 1) {
+		/*
+		 * Someone really wants this to run. If it's not unfair, run it.
+		 */
 		se = cfs_rq->next;
+	} else if (cfs_rq->last && wakeup_preempt_entity(cfs_rq->last, left) < 1) {
+		/*
+		 * Prefer last buddy, try to return the CPU to a preempted task.
+		 */
+		se = cfs_rq->last;
+	}
 
 	clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se);