linux-kernel - Re: [Patch 1/2] cpufreq: tegra194: get consistent cpuinfo_cur

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <207633bf-492b-02e6-b6df-55958ba53d0e@nvidia.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:12:44 +0100
From:   Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC:     Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        <thierry.reding@...il.com>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <ksitaraman@...dia.com>,
        <bbasu@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] cpufreq: tegra194: get consistent cpuinfo_cur_freq


On 05/10/2020 05:34, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 17-09-20, 09:36, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Viresh, ideally we need to include this fix for v5.9. Do you need Sumit
>> to resend with the Fixes tag or are you happy to add?
> 
> I understand that this fixes a patch which got merged recently, but I am not
> sure if anything is broken badly right now, i.e. will make the hardware work
> incorrectly.
> 
> Do we really need to get these in 5.9 ? As these are significant changes and may
> cause more bugs. Won't getting them in 5.9-stable and 5.10-rc1 be enough ?


Yes we want these in v5.9 ideally but yes we could merge to 5.9-stable
once accepted into the mainline. 		

Jon

-- 
nvpublic