linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: nvmem: Add qcom,sc7180-qfprom compatible string

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7486a297-e47d-5366-3eb2-5f1787c9d1dc@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:15:53 +0100
From:   Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:     Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: nvmem: Add qcom,sc7180-qfprom compatible
 string



On 03/10/2020 00:14, Evan Green wrote:
>> You don't want either/or.  You want both.  At the time Srinivas didn't
>> see the point of having the SoC-specific compatible string here, but
>> now that we have a reason for it maybe he'll be convinced?  IMO you
>> essentially want:
>>
>>      items:
>>        - enum:
>>            - qcom,apq8064-qfprom
>>            - qcom,apq8084-qfprom
>>            - qcom,msm8974-qfprom
>>            - qcom,msm8916-qfprom
>>            - qcom,msm8996-qfprom
>>            - qcom,msm8998-qfprom
>>            - qcom,qcs404-qfprom
>>            - qcom,sc7180-qfprom
>>            - qcom,sdm845-qfprom
>>        - const: qcom,qfprom
>>
>> For some context:
>> <https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAD=FV=WjvAWVmq3fTh=_f2p1Dv+sXg1RV-CqZr8KRgHe8_wT0w@mail.gmail.com/>
> That makes sense, thanks Doug.
> 
> Srini, do you want me to go fix up all the various device trees to add
> the soc-compatible string, or just sc7180? (Also, don't forget about
> my other question about whether you still want the keepout stuff in
> the core at the cost of added complexity).

Lets keep the existing users as it for now! and we can still list 
compatibles in the bindings so that any new users (including sc7180) can 
start using them when needed!

thanks,
srini


> 
> -Evan
>