[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201005112755.GS425362@ulmo>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 13:27:55 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
Venkat Reddy Talla <vreddytalla@...dia.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] soc/tegra: pmc: Allow optional irq parent callbacks
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 12:14:42PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Make the PMC driver resistent to variable depth interrupt hierarchy,
> which we are about to introduce. The irq_chip structure is now
> allocated statically, providing the indirection for the couple of
> callbacks that are SoC-specific.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> index d332e5d9abac..9960f7c18431 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> @@ -439,7 +439,6 @@ struct tegra_pmc {
> struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev;
>
> struct irq_domain *domain;
> - struct irq_chip irq;
Did you have any particular reason for pulling this out of the struct
tegra_pmc and making it a global variable?
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists