linux-kernel - Re: [Patch 1/2] cpufreq: tegra194: get consistent cpuinfo_cur

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201005043433.hvyjmzafazg46kvv@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Mon, 5 Oct 2020 10:04:33 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc:     Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        thierry.reding@...il.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ksitaraman@...dia.com,
        bbasu@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] cpufreq: tegra194: get consistent cpuinfo_cur_freq

On 17-09-20, 09:36, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Viresh, ideally we need to include this fix for v5.9. Do you need Sumit
> to resend with the Fixes tag or are you happy to add?

I understand that this fixes a patch which got merged recently, but I am not
sure if anything is broken badly right now, i.e. will make the hardware work
incorrectly.

Do we really need to get these in 5.9 ? As these are significant changes and may
cause more bugs. Won't getting them in 5.9-stable and 5.10-rc1 be enough ?

-- 
viresh