[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62586cc041b513240fba252f0b256e30@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 13:59:52 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
Venkat Reddy Talla <vreddytalla@...dia.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] soc/tegra: pmc: Allow optional irq parent callbacks
On 2020-10-05 12:27, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 12:14:42PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Make the PMC driver resistent to variable depth interrupt hierarchy,
>> which we are about to introduce. The irq_chip structure is now
>> allocated statically, providing the indirection for the couple of
>> callbacks that are SoC-specific.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 65
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>> index d332e5d9abac..9960f7c18431 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
>> @@ -439,7 +439,6 @@ struct tegra_pmc {
>> struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev;
>>
>> struct irq_domain *domain;
>> - struct irq_chip irq;
>
> Did you have any particular reason for pulling this out of the struct
> tegra_pmc and making it a global variable?
The main reason is that it really isn't per-PMC. You can do everything
with a single one that is used even if you have multiple PMCs of
different
types (not sure that's possible with the current HW, but still).
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists