[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrVtz29w=gONGO8_sGDQU-ZSXH2NyMuwRL7-27ae=jt_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 14:50:58 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>
Cc: "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Shirish.S@....com,
Akshu Agrawal <Akshu.Agrawal@....com>,
"Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra" <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@....com>,
"Wang, Chris" <chris.wang@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci-acpi: AMDI0040: Allow changing HS200/HS400
driver strength
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 23:59, Raul E Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> This change will allow platform designers better control over signal
> integrity by allowing them to tune the HS200 and HS400 driver strengths.
>
> The driver strength was previously hard coded to A to solve boot
> problems with certain platforms. This driver strength does not
> universally apply to all platforms so we need a knob to adjust it.
>
> All older platforms currently have the SDR104 preset hard coded to A in
> the firmware. This means that switching from the hard coded value in
> the kernel to reading the SDR104 preset is a no-op for these platforms.
> Newer platforms will have properly set presets. So this change will
> support both new and old platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>
Applied for next, thanks!
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
>
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> index d335a34ad05b3..5c9a041af5b4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> @@ -545,10 +545,43 @@ struct amd_sdhci_host {
>
> static int amd_select_drive_strength(struct mmc_card *card,
> unsigned int max_dtr, int host_drv,
> - int card_drv, int *drv_type)
> + int card_drv, int *host_driver_strength)
> {
> - *drv_type = MMC_SET_DRIVER_TYPE_A;
> - return MMC_SET_DRIVER_TYPE_A;
> + struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(card->host);
> + u16 preset, preset_driver_strength;
> +
> + /*
> + * This method is only called by mmc_select_hs200 so we only need to
> + * read from the HS200 (SDR104) preset register.
> + *
> + * Firmware that has "invalid/default" presets return a driver strength
> + * of A. This matches the previously hard coded value.
> + */
> + preset = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_PRESET_FOR_SDR104);
> + preset_driver_strength =
> + (preset & SDHCI_PRESET_DRV_MASK) >> SDHCI_PRESET_DRV_SHIFT;
> +
> + /*
> + * We want the controller driver strength to match the card's driver
> + * strength so they have similar rise/fall times.
> + *
> + * The controller driver strength set by this method is sticky for all
> + * timings after this method is called. This unfortunately means that
> + * while HS400 tuning is in progress we end up with mismatched driver
> + * strengths between the controller and the card. HS400 tuning requires
> + * switching from HS400->DDR52->HS->HS200->HS400. So the driver mismatch
> + * happens while in DDR52 and HS modes. This has not been observed to
> + * cause problems. Enabling presets would fix this issue.
> + */
> + *host_driver_strength = preset_driver_strength;
> +
> + /*
> + * The resulting card driver strength is only set when switching the
> + * card's timing to HS200 or HS400. The card will use the default driver
> + * strength (B) for any other mode.
> + */
> + return preset_driver_strength;
> +
> }
>
> static void sdhci_acpi_amd_hs400_dll(struct sdhci_host *host, bool enable)
> --
> 2.28.0.709.gb0816b6eb0-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists