lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 5 Oct 2020 16:22:46 +0200
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] mm, page_alloc: optionally disable pcplists during
 page isolation

On 10/5/20 4:05 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 25-09-20 13:10:05, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 9/25/20 12:54 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>
>> Hmm that temporary write lock would still block new callers until previous
>> finish with the downgraded-to-read lock.
>>
>> But I guess something like this would work:
>>
>> retry:
>>   if (atomic_read(...) == 0) {
>>     // zone_update... + drain
>>     atomic_inc(...);
>>   else if (atomic_inc_return == 1)
>>     // atomic_cmpxchg from 0 to 1; if that fails, goto retry
>>
>> Tricky, but races could only read to unnecessary duplicated updates + flushing
>> but nothing worse?
>>
>> Or add another spinlock to cover this part instead of the temp write lock...
> 
> Do you plan to post a new version or should I review this one?

I will, hopefully this week, but you could comment on other details and
overall approach meanwhile? I don't think it will change significantly.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ