lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 05 Oct 2020 16:47:35 +0200
From:   Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, od@...c.me,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpu/drm: ingenic: Add option to mmap GEM
 buffers
 cached"

Hi,

Le lun. 5 oct. 2020 à 16:05, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 11:01:50PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>  Hi Paul,
>> 
>>  On Sun, 04 Oct 2020 22:11:23 +0200 Paul Cercueil 
>> <paul@...pouillou.net> wrote:
>>  >
>>  > Pushed to drm-misc-next with the changelog fix, thanks.
>>  >
>>  > Stephen:
>>  > Now it should build fine again. Could you remove the BROKEN flag?
>> 
>>  Thanks for letting me know, but the fix has not appeared in any drm
>>  tree included in linux-next yet ...
>> 
>>  If it doesn't show up by the time I will merge the drm tree 
>> tomorrow, I
>>  will apply this revert patch myself (instead of the patch marking 
>> the
>>  driver BROKEN).
> 
> Yeah it should have been pushed to drm-misc-next-fixes per
> 
> https://drm.pages.freedesktop.org/maintainer-tools/committer-drm-misc.html#where-do-i-apply-my-patch
> 
> Paul, can you pls git cherry-pick -x this over to drm-misc-next-fixes?

I had a few commits on top of it in drm-misc-next, so the revert 
doesn't apply cleanly in drm-misc-next-fixes... I can revert it there, 
but then we'd have a different revert commit in drm-misc-next and 
drm-misc-next-next.

Sorry for the mess. What should I do?

-Paul


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ