[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201005142118.050721161@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 17:27:05 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.8 69/85] blk-mq: call commit_rqs while list empty but error happen
From: yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
[ Upstream commit 632bfb6323799c087fcb4108dfe59518609667a7 ]
Blk-mq should call commit_rqs once 'bd.last != true' and no more
request will come(so virtscsi can kick the virtqueue, e.g.). We already
do that in 'blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list/blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly' while
list not empty and 'queued > 0'. However, we can seen the same scene
once the last request in list call queue_rq and return error like
BLK_STS_IOERR which will not requeue the request, and lead that list
empty but need call commit_rqs too(Or the request for virtscsi will stay
timeout until other request kick virtqueue).
We found this problem by do fsstress test with offline/online virtscsi
device repeat quickly.
Fixes: d666ba98f849 ("blk-mq: add mq_ops->commit_rqs()")
Reported-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index a366726094a89..8e623e0282757 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1304,6 +1304,11 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list,
hctx->dispatched[queued_to_index(queued)]++;
+ /* If we didn't flush the entire list, we could have told the driver
+ * there was more coming, but that turned out to be a lie.
+ */
+ if ((!list_empty(list) || errors) && q->mq_ops->commit_rqs && queued)
+ q->mq_ops->commit_rqs(hctx);
/*
* Any items that need requeuing? Stuff them into hctx->dispatch,
* that is where we will continue on next queue run.
@@ -1311,14 +1316,6 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list,
if (!list_empty(list)) {
bool needs_restart;
- /*
- * If we didn't flush the entire list, we could have told
- * the driver there was more coming, but that turned out to
- * be a lie.
- */
- if (q->mq_ops->commit_rqs && queued)
- q->mq_ops->commit_rqs(hctx);
-
spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
list_splice_tail_init(list, &hctx->dispatch);
spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
@@ -1971,6 +1968,7 @@ void blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
struct list_head *list)
{
int queued = 0;
+ int errors = 0;
while (!list_empty(list)) {
blk_status_t ret;
@@ -1987,6 +1985,7 @@ void blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
break;
}
blk_mq_end_request(rq, ret);
+ errors++;
} else
queued++;
}
@@ -1996,7 +1995,8 @@ void blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
* the driver there was more coming, but that turned out to
* be a lie.
*/
- if (!list_empty(list) && hctx->queue->mq_ops->commit_rqs && queued)
+ if ((!list_empty(list) || errors) &&
+ hctx->queue->mq_ops->commit_rqs && queued)
hctx->queue->mq_ops->commit_rqs(hctx);
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists