[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201005064400.GA7462@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 07:44:00 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: jitterentropy - bind statically into kernel
[adding Thomas]
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 08:40:25AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > If jitterentropy is a special case, we could put a alternate
> > non-'static inline' version of random_get_entropy() in the core
> > kernel, and only export it if JITTER_ENTROPY is built as a module in
> > the first place. But I'd prefer it if jitterentropy switches to an API
> > that is suitable for driver consumption.
>
> Which API do you have in mind? In user space, I use
> clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME) which also considers the clock source.
We could probably add a kernel_clock_gettime which contains the
clock_gettime syscal implementation minus the put_timespec64. Thomas,
is this something that fits your timekeeping vision?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists