linux-kernel - [PATCH v16 01/15] mtd: spi-nor: core: use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201005153138.6437-2-p.yadav@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Oct 2020 21:01:24 +0530
From:   Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
To:     Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
Subject: [PATCH v16 01/15] mtd: spi-nor: core: use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP

ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code. Using EOPNOTSUPP is preferred
in its stead.

Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
---
 drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
index 0369d98b2d12..4d0f8d165544 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
@@ -2281,7 +2281,7 @@ static int spi_nor_hwcaps_pp2cmd(u32 hwcaps)
  *@nor:        pointer to a 'struct spi_nor'
  *@op:         pointer to op template to be checked
  *
- * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -ENOTSUPP otherwise.
+ * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -EOPNOTSUPP otherwise.
  */
 static int spi_nor_spimem_check_op(struct spi_nor *nor,
 				   struct spi_mem_op *op)
@@ -2295,12 +2295,12 @@ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_op(struct spi_nor *nor,
 	op->addr.nbytes = 4;
 	if (!spi_mem_supports_op(nor->spimem, op)) {
 		if (nor->mtd.size > SZ_16M)
-			return -ENOTSUPP;
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
 		/* If flash size <= 16MB, 3 address bytes are sufficient */
 		op->addr.nbytes = 3;
 		if (!spi_mem_supports_op(nor->spimem, op))
-			return -ENOTSUPP;
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -2312,7 +2312,7 @@ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_op(struct spi_nor *nor,
  *@nor:         pointer to a 'struct spi_nor'
  *@...d:        pointer to op template to be checked
  *
- * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -ENOTSUPP otherwise.
+ * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -EOPNOTSUPP otherwise.
  */
 static int spi_nor_spimem_check_readop(struct spi_nor *nor,
 				       const struct spi_nor_read_command *read)
@@ -2338,7 +2338,7 @@ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_readop(struct spi_nor *nor,
  *@nor:         pointer to a 'struct spi_nor'
  *@pp:          pointer to op template to be checked
  *
- * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -ENOTSUPP otherwise.
+ * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -EOPNOTSUPP otherwise.
  */
 static int spi_nor_spimem_check_pp(struct spi_nor *nor,
 				   const struct spi_nor_pp_command *pp)
-- 
2.28.0