[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201006231706.2744579-1-haoluo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 16:17:06 -0700
From: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Fix test_verifier after introducing resolve_pseudo_ldimm64
Commit 4976b718c355 ("bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id") switched
the order of check_subprogs() and resolve_pseudo_ldimm() in
the verifier. Now an empty prog and the prog of a single
invalid ldimm expect to see the error "last insn is not an
exit or jmp" instead, because the check for subprogs comes
first. Fix the expection of the error message.
Tested:
# ./test_verifier
Summary: 1130 PASSED, 538 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
and the full set of bpf selftests.
Fixes: 4976b718c355 ("bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id")
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c
index b8d18642653a..de84f0d57082 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/basic.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
"empty prog",
.insns = {
},
- .errstr = "unknown opcode 00",
+ .errstr = "last insn is not an exit or jmp",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c
index 3856dba733e9..f300ba62edd0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ld_imm64.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
.insns = {
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW, 0, 0, 0, 0),
},
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_ld_imm64 insn",
+ .errstr = "last insn is not an exit or jmp",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
--
2.28.0.806.g8561365e88-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists