linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 00/32] Improvements for Tegra I2C driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201006044851.GA883@kunai>
Date:   Tue, 6 Oct 2020 06:48:51 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/32] Improvements for Tegra I2C driver

Hi Dmitry,

> Hello, Wolfram! Thank you! This series started with 10 small patches and
> then was growing with every new review round because more ideas were
> suggested and I needed to rebase/redo majority of the patches, hence it
> was a bit difficult to split it up into a smaller parts that could be
> applied incrementally. But I'll try to improve this in the future, thanks!

Ah, you got me wrong. What I meant was: If these patches still need
changes or updates, don't send a new version of all the patches, but
rather send incremental fixes on top of these patches. Sometimes it
happens that you end up with 30+ patches, no worries.

> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=191802
> > 
> > Is it obsolete by now?
> > 
> 
> To be honest, I don't know. The author never answered, guess he may
> reappear sometime in the future with a v2. Those patches need to be
> corrected and rebased.

Then, I will mark them as "Changes requested". Thanks for the heads up!

Regards,

   Wolfram


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)