linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the mfd tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Oct 2020 17:03:08 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the mfd tree

Hi all,

FIXME: Add owner of second tree to To:
       Add author(s)/SOB of conflicting commits.

Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:

  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/samsung/sysreg.yaml

between commit:

  18394297562a ("dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: Merge Samsung Exynos Sysreg bindings")

from the mfd tree and commit:

  41fb845621ea ("dt-bindings: Another round of adding missing 'additionalProperties'")

from the devicetree tree.

I fixed it up (I just deleted the file) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped