[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201006011550.GG6041@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:15:50 -0700
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drivers core: Introduce CPU type sysfs interface
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 08:27:41PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/2/20 6:17 PM, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * arch_get_cpu_type() - Get the CPU type number
> > + * @cpu: Index of the CPU of which the index is needed
> > + *
> > + * Get the CPU type number of @cpu, a non-zero unsigned 32-bit number that
Thank you for your feedback Randy!
> Are you sure that @cpu is non-zero?
This is the intent. Maybe it can be reworked to return -EINVAL instead?
I gues it is plausible but less likely that an arch defines a type as
0xffffffea;
>
> > + * uniquely identifies a type of CPU micro-architecture. All CPUs of the same
> > + * type have the same type number. Type numbers are defined by each CPU
> > + * architecture.
> > + */
> > +u32 __weak arch_get_cpu_type(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> arch_get_cpu_type() in patch 4/4 allows @cpu to be 0.
It should not return 0 if the system does not have
X86_FEATURE_HYBRID_CPU. The currently existing CPU types are all
non-zero as per the Intel SDM. Am I missing anything?
Thanks and BR,
Ricardo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists