[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201006021729.GA4822@labundy.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 21:17:29 -0500
From: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@...undy.com>
To: Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/12] dt-bindings: mfd: Fix schema warnings for
pwm-leds
Hi Alexander,
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 10:34:42PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain
> naming scheme (now). Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended
> by DT project.
>
> DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
> CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
> /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v6 -> v7:
> * added warning message to commit message (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
>
> v6:
> * added this patch to series
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml
> index 541b06d80e73..92dc48a8dfa7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.yaml
> @@ -90,10 +90,11 @@ examples:
> };
> };
>
> - pwmleds {
> + led-controller {
> compatible = "pwm-leds";
>
> - panel {
> + led-1 {
> + label = "panel";
> pwms = <&iqs620a_pwm 0 1000000>;
> max-brightness = <255>;
> };
> --
> 2.20.1
>
I like the consistency this brings. My only feedback is that in the other
examples I found (common.yaml and leds-gpio.yaml), the children count off
from 0 (e.g. led-0) instead of 1 as your series appears to.
That's not a huge deal; it simply seems more consistent to count from the
first index allowed by the regex (0). The patch is still fine, and so:
Acked-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@...undy.com>
Kind regards,
Jeff LaBundy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists