[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a0403a430b14484a026b52a5ecbbeeb@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 15:07:41 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org" <linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stern@...land.harvard.edu" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"parri.andrea@...il.com" <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
"boqun.feng@...il.com" <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
"npiggin@...il.com" <npiggin@...il.com>,
"dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"j.alglave@....ac.uk" <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
"luc.maranget@...ia.fr" <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
"akiyks@...il.com" <akiyks@...il.com>,
"dlustig@...dia.com" <dlustig@...dia.com>,
"joel@...lfernandes.org" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: Control Dependencies vs C Compilers
> Please go read memory-barriers.txt for a bunch of other examples.
My brain hurts.
It's not as though I've not known about most of this since
the first SMP capable SPARC cpus that had a 'store buffer'.
(Probably 30 years ago.)
I sometimes wonder whether compiling things like the kernel
requires a compiler mode that defaults everything (except
function locals) to 'volatile'.
Although that still does fix control dependencies.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists