linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] docs: RCU: Requirements.rst: fix a list block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201006163615.GL29330@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date:   Tue, 6 Oct 2020 09:36:15 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] docs: RCU: Requirements.rst: fix a list block

On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 03:21:32PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> As warned by Sphinx:
> 	.../Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst:1959: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
> 
> The list block is missing a space before it, making Sphinx
> to get it wrong.
> 
> Fixes: 2a721e5f0b2c ("docs: Update RCU's hotplug requirements with a bit about design")
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>

Applied, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
> index 98557fee90cc..9f362827133a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
> @@ -1954,6 +1954,7 @@ offline CPUs.  However, as a debugging measure, the FQS loop does splat
>  if offline CPUs block an RCU grace period for too long.
>  
>  An offline CPU's quiescent state will be reported either:
> +
>  1.  As the CPU goes offline using RCU's hotplug notifier (``rcu_report_dead()``).
>  2.  When grace period initialization (``rcu_gp_init()``) detects a
>      race either with CPU offlining or with a task unblocking on a leaf
> -- 
> 2.26.2
>