lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 6 Oct 2020 12:55:30 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the
 kselftest-fixes tree

On 10/6/20 5:07 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>    tools/testing/selftests/vm/gup_test.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>    aa803771a80a ("tools: Avoid comma separated statements")
> 
> from the kselftest-fixes tree and commit:
> 
>    5c64830675a6 ("mm/gup_benchmark: rename to mm/gup_test")
> 
> from the akpm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 

Hi Stephen,

Thanks for fixing it. I will mention it in my pull request to Linus

thanks,
-- Shuah

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ