lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201006200138.GA6026@xz-x1>
Date:   Tue, 6 Oct 2020 16:01:38 -0400
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the akpm-current tree

On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 11:05:16PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (sparc
> defconfig) produced this warning:
> 
> mm/memory.c: In function 'copy_present_page':
> mm/memory.c:800:20: warning: unused variable 'dst_mm' [-Wunused-variable]
>   struct mm_struct *dst_mm = dst_vma->vm_mm;
>                     ^~~~~~
> mm/memory.c: In function 'copy_present_pte':
> mm/memory.c:889:20: warning: unused variable 'dst_mm' [-Wunused-variable]
>   struct mm_struct *dst_mm = dst_vma->vm_mm;
>                     ^~~~~~
> 
> Maybe introduced by commit
> 
>   7e6cdccef3df ("mm-remove-src-dst-mm-parameter-in-copy_page_range-v2")

Yes it is.  The mm pointer is only used by set_pte_at(), while I just noticed
that some of the archs do not use the mm pointer at all, hence this warning.

The required change attached; this is quite special that we only referenced the
mm once in each of the function, so that temp variable can actually be avoided.
Ideally there should be some way to only define the variable on archs that need
this mm pointer (e.g., when set_pte_at() or some similar function is called
multiple times in some function, it should still be helpful to introduce a
local variable to keep dst_vma->vm_mm).  However I don't know a good way to do
this...

Thanks,

------------8<------------
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 8ade87e8600a..d9b16136014c 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -798,7 +798,6 @@ copy_present_page(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma
                  pte_t *dst_pte, pte_t *src_pte, unsigned long addr, int *rss,
                  struct page **prealloc, pte_t pte, struct page *page)
 {
-       struct mm_struct *dst_mm = dst_vma->vm_mm;
        struct mm_struct *src_mm = src_vma->vm_mm;
        struct page *new_page;

@@ -874,7 +873,7 @@ copy_present_page(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma
        /* All done, just insert the new page copy in the child */
        pte = mk_pte(new_page, dst_vma->vm_page_prot);
        pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), dst_vma);
-       set_pte_at(dst_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
+       set_pte_at(dst_vma->vm_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
        return 0;
 }

@@ -887,7 +886,6 @@ copy_present_pte(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma,
                 pte_t *dst_pte, pte_t *src_pte, unsigned long addr, int *rss,
                 struct page **prealloc)
 {
-       struct mm_struct *dst_mm = dst_vma->vm_mm;
        struct mm_struct *src_mm = src_vma->vm_mm;
        unsigned long vm_flags = src_vma->vm_flags;
        pte_t pte = *src_pte;
@@ -932,7 +930,7 @@ copy_present_pte(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma,
        if (!(vm_flags & VM_UFFD_WP))
                pte = pte_clear_uffd_wp(pte);

-       set_pte_at(dst_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
+       set_pte_at(dst_vma->vm_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
        return 0;
 }
------------8<------------

-- 
Peter Xu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ