[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201007080405.5e90a579@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 08:04:05 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
Hi Josh,
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 09:30:12 -0500 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:10:56PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > Josh, any ideas? We could, of course, make it "r"(size), but that would
> > > be unpleasant in all existing callers...
> >
> > Sorry, I've been traveling. I'd just vote for making it "r".
> >
> > array_index_nospec() is always called after a usercopy. I don't think
> > anyone will notice the extra mov, for the cases where it would be
> > propagated as an immediate. And the argument *is* an unsigned long
> > after all.
> >
> > Stephen, can you confirm this fixes it?
>
> Still traveling, I didn't see an update on this. Any objections to the
> below? I assume it fixes Stephen's build issue.
Yes, it does fix my x86_64 allnoconfig build.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists