[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d06c6c0652e64ae79a55951e94df3610@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 02:51:15 +0000
From: linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: mmap: Fix general protection fault in
unlink_file_vma()
Friendly ping.
> The syzbot reported the below general protection fault:
>
> general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
> 0xe00eeaee0000003b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
> KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0x00777770000001d8-0x00777770000001df]
> CPU: 1 PID: 10488 Comm: syz-executor721 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3-syzkaller #0
>
> It's because the ->mmap() callback can change vma->vm_file and fput the original file. But the commit d70cec898324 ("mm: mmap: merge vma after
> call_mmap() if possible") failed to catch this case and always fput() the original file, hence add an extra fput().
>
> [ Thanks Hillf for pointing this extra fput() out. ]
>
> @@ -1815,7 +1815,11 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> merge = vma_merge(mm, prev, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, vma->vm_flags,
> NULL, vma->vm_file, vma->vm_pgoff, NULL, NULL_VM_UFFD_CTX);
> if (merge) {
> - fput(file);
> + /* ->mmap() can change vma->vm_file and fput the original file. So
> + * fput the vma->vm_file here or we would add an extra fput for file
> + * and cause general protection fault ultimately.
> + */
> + fput(vma->vm_file);
> vm_area_free(vma);
> vma = merge;
> /* Update vm_flags and possible addr to pick up the change. We don't
> --
> 2.19.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists