[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7bdf462-c86d-f248-58f4-d9d41b2bd343@deltatee.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 18:13:33 -0600
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v2 05/11] nvme: Add common helpers for passthru
tests
On 2020-10-06 6:02 p.m., Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> On 9/30/20 12:01, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> Add some simple helpers to setup a passthru target that passes through
>> to a nvme test device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
>> ---
>> tests/nvme/rc | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/nvme/rc b/tests/nvme/rc
>> index dfa57a299625..1ea23308a3f7 100644
>> --- a/tests/nvme/rc
>> +++ b/tests/nvme/rc
>> @@ -73,6 +73,17 @@ _require_nvme_trtype_is_fabrics() {
>> return 0
>> }
>>
>> +_test_dev_nvme_ctrl() {
>> + local dev
>> +
>> + dev=$(cat "${TEST_DEV_SYSFS}/device/dev")
> can you initialize dev this at the time of declaration ?
Yup, will fix.
>> + echo "/dev/char/${dev}"
>> +}
>> +
>> +_test_dev_nvme_nsid() {
>> + cat "${TEST_DEV_SYSFS}/nsid"
>> +}
>> +
>> _cleanup_nvmet() {
>> local dev
>> local port
>> @@ -257,6 +268,27 @@ _remove_nvmet_subsystem() {
>> rmdir "${subsys_path}"
>> }
>>
>> +_create_nvmet_passthru() {
>> + local nvmet_subsystem="$1"
>> + local subsys_path="${NVMET_CFS}/subsystems/${nvmet_subsystem}"
>> + local passthru_path="${subsys_path}/passthru"
>> +
>> + mkdir -p "${subsys_path}"
>> + printf 1 > "${subsys_path}/attr_allow_any_host"
>> +
>> + printf "%s" "$(_test_dev_nvme_ctrl)" > "${passthru_path}/device_path"
>> + printf 1 > "${passthru_path}/enable"
>
> can you please echo in general and printf only when it is needed ?>
> I know existing code is a bit inconsistent I'll send a clenup to make it
> uniform.
Yes, I agree. I will it fix in v3.
Thanks,
Logan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists