linux-kernel - [RFC v9 04/10] selftests/damon/_chk_record: Do not check number of gaps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201007071409.12174-5-sjpark@amazon.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:14:03 +0200
From:   SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>
To:     <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>, <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        <aarcange@...hat.com>, <acme@...nel.org>,
        <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, <amit@...nel.org>,
        <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, <brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>,
        <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, <cai@....pw>,
        <colin.king@...onical.com>, <corbet@....net>, <david@...hat.com>,
        <dwmw@...zon.com>, <elver@...gle.com>, <fan.du@...el.com>,
        <foersleo@...zon.de>, <gthelen@...gle.com>, <irogers@...gle.com>,
        <jolsa@...hat.com>, <kirill@...temov.name>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <mgorman@...e.de>, <minchan@...nel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
        <namhyung@...nel.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <rdunlap@...radead.org>, <riel@...riel.com>, <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <rppt@...nel.org>, <sblbir@...zon.com>,
        <shakeelb@...gle.com>, <shuah@...nel.org>, <sj38.park@...il.com>,
        <snu@...zon.de>, <vbabka@...e.cz>, <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>, <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        <zgf574564920@...il.com>, <linux-damon@...zon.com>,
        <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC v9 04/10] selftests/damon/_chk_record: Do not check number of gaps

From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>

Now the regions can be explicitly set as users want.  Therefore checking
the number of gaps doesn't make sense.  Remove the condition.

Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/damon/_chk_record.py | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/damon/_chk_record.py b/tools/testing/selftests/damon/_chk_record.py
index 73e128904319..5f11be64abed 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/damon/_chk_record.py
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/damon/_chk_record.py
@@ -37,12 +37,9 @@ def chk_task_info(f):
         print('too many regions: %d > %d' % (nr_regions, max_nr_regions))
         exit(1)
 
-    nr_gaps = 0
     eaddr = 0
     for r in range(nr_regions):
         saddr = struct.unpack('L', f.read(8))[0]
-        if eaddr and saddr != eaddr:
-            nr_gaps += 1
         eaddr = struct.unpack('L', f.read(8))[0]
         nr_accesses = struct.unpack('I', f.read(4))[0]
 
@@ -56,9 +53,6 @@ def chk_task_info(f):
                 print('too high nr_access: expected %d but %d' %
                         (max_nr_accesses, nr_accesses))
                 exit(1)
-    if nr_gaps != 2:
-        print('number of gaps are not two but %d' % nr_gaps)
-        exit(1)
 
 def parse_time_us(bindat):
     sec = struct.unpack('l', bindat[0:8])[0]
-- 
2.17.1