linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] i2c: imx: Fix reset of I2SR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJKOXPd+kqwnFiqEz6wDRcA3Xeqo8zngQWEzc4svrND=Zi=3FQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:27:02 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>
Cc:     Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] i2c: imx: Fix reset of I2SR_IAL flag

On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 10:17, Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 7 October 2020, 09:50:23 CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > I replied to your v2 with testing, so what happened with all my tested tags?
>
> I am quite new to the kernel development process. Seems that I should
> integrate all "Tested-by" tags into following version of my patches.
>
> In which cases shall the tested tags be kept and in which cases they become
> invalid?

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L584

Your v3 touched only one patch, so all tags for all other patches
should be added and preserved. If the patch changed significantly that
review or testing is not appropriate, you could remove someone's tag
but then you should ask for testing again. And you did not send it for
testing.

Your v4 only extended a comment which does not affect testing. All
tags, review, ack and tested by should be added/preserved.

Otherwise you ask for testing (or reviewing) and then do not credit
this person. Neither maintainers know that patches were tested.

Best regards,
Krzysztof