[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZcfR8Vyavpi4xM1zJab6SgapGBYqK9GR2mp-xh=LuVsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:38:49 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...vell.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"(Exiting) Amit Kucheria" <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/4] Introduce the for_each_set_clump macro
On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 11:20 AM Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@...il.com> wrote:
> Since this patchset primarily affects GPIO drivers, would you like
> to pick it up through your GPIO tree?
Definitely will, once we are finished!
I see Andy still has comments and we need more iterations.
That is fine, because we are not in any hurry. Just keep posting
it!
Let's merge this for v5.11 when we are finished with it.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists