linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 03/12] dt-bindings: mfd: Fix schema warnings for pwm-leds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 07 Oct 2020 12:08:46 +0200
From:   Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Jeff LaBundy <jeff@...undy.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/12] dt-bindings: mfd: Fix schema warnings for pwm-leds

Hei Pavel,

Am Mittwoch, 7. Oktober 2020, 12:03:59 CEST schrieb Pavel Machek:
> > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain
> > naming scheme (now).  Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended
> > by DT project.
> > 
> >   DTC     Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
> >   CHECK   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
> > 
> > /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.exampl
> > e.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes:
> > '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'> 
> >         From schema:
> >         /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/
> >         leds-pwm.yaml> 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de>
> 
> Okay, so I need Rob's ack here, I guess... and rest of the series is
> not really for my tree.

I think so, too.

I saw you applied patch number 1, all the other patches are DT and from my 
side those can wait for the Acks required and maybe I change the indexes again 
and I'm fine resending all that after the 5.10 merge window.

Thanks for applying the non-DT patches for leds subsystem, the rest will be 
sorted out without hurry.

Greets
Alex