[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2640582.VKub60Wb7X@ada>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 12:08:46 +0200
From: Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Jeff LaBundy <jeff@...undy.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/12] dt-bindings: mfd: Fix schema warnings for pwm-leds
Hei Pavel,
Am Mittwoch, 7. Oktober 2020, 12:03:59 CEST schrieb Pavel Machek:
> > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain
> > naming scheme (now). Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended
> > by DT project.
> >
> > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
> > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
> >
> > /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.exampl
> > e.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes:
> > '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'>
> > From schema:
> > /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/
> > leds-pwm.yaml>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de>
>
> Okay, so I need Rob's ack here, I guess... and rest of the series is
> not really for my tree.
I think so, too.
I saw you applied patch number 1, all the other patches are DT and from my
side those can wait for the Acks required and maybe I change the indexes again
and I'm fine resending all that after the 5.10 merge window.
Thanks for applying the non-DT patches for leds subsystem, the rest will be
sorted out without hurry.
Greets
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists