linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] clk: aspeed: modify some default clks are critical

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACPK8XdBmkhZ8mcSFmDAFV8k7Qj7ajBL8TVKfK8c+5aneUMHZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:34:01 +0000
From:   Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
To:     Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>
Cc:     Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        BMC-SW <BMC-SW@...eedtech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] clk: aspeed: modify some default clks are critical

On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 08:40, Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 4:04 PM
> > To: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>; Jae Hyun Yoo
> > <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>; Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
> > Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>; Stephen Boyd
> > <sboyd@...nel.org>; linux-clk@...r.kernel.org; Linux ARM
> > <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>; linux-aspeed
> > <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> > <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; BMC-SW <BMC-SW@...eedtech.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] clk: aspeed: modify some default clks are critical
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 07:01, Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > In ASPEED SoC LCLK is LPC clock for all SuperIO device, UART1/UART2
> > > are default for Host SuperIO UART device, eSPI clk for Host eSPI bus
> > > access eSPI slave channel, those clks can't be disable should keep
> > > default, otherwise will affect Host side access SuperIO and SPI slave device.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/clk/clk-aspeed.c  | 8 ++++----  drivers/clk/clk-ast2600.c | 8
> > > ++++----
> > >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-aspeed.c b/drivers/clk/clk-aspeed.c index
> > > 411ff5fb2c07..d348c4fd3f9f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clk/clk-aspeed.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-aspeed.c
> > > @@ -54,15 +54,15 @@ static const struct aspeed_gate_data aspeed_gates[]
> > = {
> > >         [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_DCLK] =        {  5, -1, "dclk-gate",
> > NULL,   CLK_IS_CRITICAL }, /* DAC */
> > >         [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_REFCLK] =      {  6, -1, "refclk-gate",
> > "clkin", CLK_IS_CRITICAL },
> > >         [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_USBPORT2CLK] = {  7,  3, "usb-port2-gate",
> > NULL,   0 }, /* USB2.0 Host port 2 */
> > > -       [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_LCLK] =        {  8,  5, "lclk-gate",
> > NULL,   0 }, /* LPC */
> > > +       [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_LCLK] =        {  8,  5, "lclk-gate",
> > NULL,   CLK_IS_CRITICAL }, /* LPC */
> > >         [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_USBUHCICLK] =  {  9, 15, "usb-uhci-gate",
> > NULL,   0 }, /* USB1.1 (requires port 2 enabled) */
> > >         [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_D1CLK] =       { 10, 13, "d1clk-gate",
> > NULL,   0 }, /* GFX CRT */
> > >         [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_YCLK] =        { 13,  4, "yclk-gate",
> > NULL,   0 }, /* HAC */
> > >         [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_USBPORT1CLK] = { 14, 14, "usb-port1-gate",
> > NULL,   0 }, /* USB2 hub/USB2 host port 1/USB1.1 dev */
> > > -       [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_UART1CLK] =    { 15, -1, "uart1clk-gate",
> > "uart", 0 }, /* UART1 */
> > > -       [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_UART2CLK] =    { 16, -1, "uart2clk-gate",
> > "uart", 0 }, /* UART2 */
> > > +       [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_UART1CLK] =    { 15, -1, "uart1clk-gate",
> > "uart", CLK_IS_CRITICAL }, /* UART1 */
> > > +       [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_UART2CLK] =    { 16, -1, "uart2clk-gate",
> > "uart", CLK_IS_CRITICAL }, /* UART2 */
> > >         [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_UART5CLK] =    { 17, -1, "uart5clk-gate",
> > "uart", 0 }, /* UART5 */
> > > -       [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_ESPICLK] =     { 19, -1, "espiclk-gate",
> > NULL,   0 }, /* eSPI */
> > > +       [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_ESPICLK] =     { 19, -1, "espiclk-gate",
> > NULL,   CLK_IS_CRITICAL }, /* eSPI */
> >
> > This is fine for systems that have eSPI. For systems that do not use eSPI, the
> > clocks are not "required".
> >
> > I was sent a similar patch by Jae some time ago:
> >
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/openbmc/697a184b-ef99-a46e-bf98-4d339b3aafd8@lin
> > ux.intel.com/
> >
> > Better is to associate drivers with these clocks, and those drivers will ensure
> > they are left enabled.
> >
> > Alternatively, we will need to come up with a device tree binding to describe
> > the hardware requirement that these clocks are left on.
> >
> ASPEED BMC SoC have SuperIO device that default enable, even without BMC fw boot.
> Host can use SUART1/SUART2/GPIO....
> That the reason even Linux kernel boot should not change the SoC default clk, that is the impact.

Ok, that makes sense. Linux will not enable these clocks if a driver
is loaded for them though, so we should load a driver for them.

ESPI: We do not have an upstream driver for eSPI, but once you submit
one this will solve the eSPI issue.

LPC: The existing LPC driver will enable the clock, so by loading that
this clock will be left enabled.

UART1/UART2: This is harder, as the SUART mode means the BMC does not
load a driver for these devices. We could add a property to the device
tree to describe the clocks that must be left on?

Cheers,

Joel