linux-kernel - Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9-rc8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5f5c303d30eaa32c21131502cc6f28db9d655329.camel@tiscali.nl>
Date:   Wed, 07 Oct 2020 14:45:30 +0200
From:   Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>,
        Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
        Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Build regressions/improvements in v5.9-rc8

Richard Weinberger schreef op wo 07-10-2020 om 14:08 [+0200]:
> UML has no ia32 emulation and therefore no in_ia32_syscall().
> Maybe you can check for CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION too?

The pending fix is:
    #if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && !defined(CONFIG_UML)

Since this check guards in_ia32_syscall() just checking CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
should do too.

(Way outside my limited expertise, but anyway: is does look odd to see a call
to in_ia32_syscall() in drivers/. All other calls are in arch/x86/. Isn't this
a bit too x86 specific for an arch independent driver?)

Thanks,


Paul Bolle