lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADZsf3bYHMAkbwSN657+EnpDTxgRr8qHiHDrM68UD7rJXQHDCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2020 03:10:37 +0200
From:   Luka Kovacic <luka.kovacic@...tura.hr>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz>,
        Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@...tura.hr>,
        Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] drivers: leds: Add the iEi WT61P803 PUZZLE LED driver

On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 8:41 AM Luka Kovacic <luka.kovacic@...tura.hr> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 9:48 PM Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > > +static int iei_wt61p803_puzzle_led_brightness_set_blocking(struct led_classdev *cdev,
> > > +             enum led_brightness brightness)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct iei_wt61p803_puzzle_led *priv = cdev_to_iei_wt61p803_puzzle_led(cdev);
> > > +     unsigned char *resp_buf = priv->response_buffer;
> > > +     unsigned char led_power_cmd[5] = {
> > > +             IEI_WT61P803_PUZZLE_CMD_HEADER_START,
> > > +             IEI_WT61P803_PUZZLE_CMD_LED,
> > > +             IEI_WT61P803_PUZZLE_CMD_LED_POWER,
> > > +             (char)IEI_LED_OFF
> > > +     };
> > > +     size_t reply_size;
> > > +
> > > +     mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
> > > +     if (brightness == LED_OFF) {
> > > +             led_power_cmd[3] = (char)IEI_LED_OFF;
> > > +             priv->led_power_state = LED_OFF;
> > > +     } else {
> > > +             led_power_cmd[3] = (char)IEI_LED_ON;
> > > +             priv->led_power_state = LED_ON;
> > > +     }
> > > +     mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
> > > +
> > > +     return iei_wt61p803_puzzle_write_command(priv->mcu, led_power_cmd,
> > > +                     sizeof(led_power_cmd), resp_buf, &reply_size);
> > > +}
> >
> > Is the mutex needed? If so, should it include the
> > iei_wt61p803_puzzle_write_command()? Does
> > iei_wt61p803_puzzle_write_command() have internal locking to prevent
> > two messages from being mingled?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >                                                                         Pavel
> >
> > --
> > (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> > (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
>
> Hello Pavel,
>
> The mutex isn't needed and can be removed.
> The function iei_wt61p803_puzzle_write_command() already handles its own
> mutex locking, so a separate mutex isn't required.
>
> Does brightness_set_blocking only block a single caller (each caller separately)
> or does it block all callers until the previous caller is finished?
>
> Kind regards,
> Luka

Hello Pavel,

I've sent out a new patchset, but I kept the mutex in use.
It's used to make sure only one read or write request is done at once,
when writing
to the LED driver private structure.

I have also added this description to the struct comment.

Kind regards,
Luka

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ