[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201007153854.17712cd3@coco.lan>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 15:38:54 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] script: add a script for checking doc problems with
external functions
Em Wed, 07 Oct 2020 01:32:31 -0700
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> escreveu:
> On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 11:23 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Tue, 06 Oct 2020, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > While not all EXPORT_SYMBOL*() symbols should be documented,
> > > it seems useful to have a tool which would help to check what
> > > symbols aren't documented.
> > >
> > > This is a first step on this direction. The tool has some
> > > limitations. Yet, it could be useful for maintainers to check
> > > about missing documents on their subsystems.
> >
> > Seems like this should be part of checkpatch.pl somehow.
>
> I don't see how.
Just sent a third version of the script. It should now be able to check
if the RST files have the exported symbols as well:
<snip>
$ scripts/check_docs_external_symbols lib/debugobjects.c
lib/debugobjects.c: export symbol debug_object_active_state not documented at: Documentation/core-api/debug-objects.rst
</snip>
It also checks if an exported symbol has duplicated entries at
kernel-doc as well.
The check logic for it is somewhat complex. so, I won't doubt that
there are some other hidden bugs.
Also, as right now, the script is slow, if one wants to run it
for the entire Kernel.
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists