linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Add shared workqueue support for idxd driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2020 20:27:33 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        tony.luck@...el.com, ashok.raj@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
        fenghua.yu@...el.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Add shared workqueue support for idxd driver

On 07-10-20, 12:04, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 03:23:13PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > Right my build failed for x86 and I have dropped these now. I would have
> > expected the dependency to be a signed tag to be cross merged when I was
> > asked to merge this.
> 
> I can give you a signed tag is you prefer but that's usually not

That would be better, signed tags are preferred

> necessary. You can simply merge tip's x86/pasid branch, then apply those
> ontop and test.

While at it, it would be good if x86 patches of this series come from
your tree, that makes more sense if we are doing a cross merge

Thanks
-- 
~Vinod