linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 1/2] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Enable UHS-1 support for Keem Bay SOC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 7 Oct 2020 16:08:47 +0000
From:   "Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini" <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC:     Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        "Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm Mailing List" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Raja Subramanian, Lakshmi Bai" 
        <lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@...el.com>,
        "Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie" 
        <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@...el.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/2] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Enable UHS-1 support for
 Keem Bay SOC

Hi ,

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 10:55 PM
>To: Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>
>Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>; Hunter, Adrian
><adrian.hunter@...el.com>; Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>; Ulf
>Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>; linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>;
>linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>; Linux Kernel
>Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Raja Subramanian, Lakshmi Bai
><lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@...el.com>; Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie
><wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@...el.com>; Arnd Bergmann
><arnd@...db.de>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Enable UHS-1 support for
>Keem Bay SOC
>
>On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:28 PM Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini
><muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com> wrote:
>> >From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
>> >Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 4:56 PM On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:38
>> >AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >> On 06. 10. 20 17:55, muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com wrote:
>
>...
>
>> >> > +     struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> >>
>> >> nit: I got this but as I see 3 lines below maybe would be better to
>> >> use it everywhere but it can be done in separate patch.
>> >
>> >In that case I think it would be better to have that patch first. It
>> >make follow up code cleaner.
>> I want to get some clarification here.
>
>> Do I need a separate patch for this struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;?
>
>It should be a separate patch and better your series starts with it, so it won't
>interfere with new code.
>
>> Can I embedded together with UHS patch?
>
>Better to avoid merging orthogonal things together in one change.
Noted. Thanks 😉
>
>--
>With Best Regards,
>Andy Shevchenko