[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dcaea6b4e1d5b4a452c304fadb034b7b1e1c40af.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 18:47:13 -0700
From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: lee.jones@...aro.org, dvhart@...radead.org, andy@...radead.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, hdegoede@...hat.com,
alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/5] PCI: Add defines for Designated Vendor-Specific
Extended Capability
On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 19:51 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 03:45:54PM -0700, David E. Box wrote:
> > Hi Bjorn,
> >
> > This patch has been acked and unchanged for weeks. Is it possible
> > to
> > get this pulled into next? We have SIOV and CXL related work that
> > is
> > using these definitions. Thanks.
>
> I acked it because I expected you to merge it along with the rest of
> the series.
>
> I guess I could merge this patch via the PCI tree if you really want,
> but that ends up being a hassle because we have to worry about which
> order things get merged to Linus' tree. Better if the whole series
> is
> merged via the same tree.
Agreed. The hope is that this series is ready for the next merge window
but no ack yet on V8. And if the series does not make it I'd like this
patch to at least get in.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists