[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202010071116.9D9A5C1416@keescook>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 11:16:45 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] drivers/acpi: convert seqno counter_atomic32
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 02:44:36PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> counter_atomic* is introduced to be used when a variable is used as
> a simple counter and doesn't guard object lifetimes. This clearly
> differentiates atomic_t usages that guard object lifetimes.
>
> counter_atomic* variables will wrap around to 0 when it overflows and
> should not be used to guard resource lifetimes, device usage and
> open counts that control state changes, and pm states.
>
> seqno is a sequence number counter for logging. This counter gets
> incremented. Unsure if there is a chance of this overflowing. It
> doesn't look like overflowing causes any problems since it is used
> to tag the log messages and nothing more.
>
> Convert it to use counter_atomic32.
>
> This conversion doesn't change the overflow wrap around behavior.
>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Agreed: this looks like logging only.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists