[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABJPP5B_nscUwm4m+PySN67Cp=i1aR8KXKRuAf2YdAj_950j2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 00:08:37 +0530
From: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] checkpatch: add new warnings to author signoff checks.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:48 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 12:08 +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 12:03 PM Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com> wrote:
> > > The author signed-off-by checks are currently very vague.
> > > Cases like same name or same address are not handled separately.
>
> Likely now, the type should be changed from NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF
> to a single something else for all the other types of messages.
>
>
Since BAD_SIGNOFF is being used for a different context, then
probably BAD_AUTHOR_SIGNOFF.
Should this work or anything else you have in mind?
Thanks,
Dwaipayan.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists