[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLWSq3szE40hC_m-qpOOH1193jYLOT1_ZZh-eW9U0gnG8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 22:03:43 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Liam Mark <lmark@...eaurora.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...nel.org>,
Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>,
Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Sandeep Patil <sspatil@...gle.com>,
Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@...gle.com>,
Chris Goldsworthy <cgoldswo@...eaurora.org>,
"??rjan Eide" <orjan.eide@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
Simon Ser <contact@...rsion.fr>,
James Jones <jajones@...dia.com>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] dma-buf: system_heap: Add a system-uncached heap
re-using the system heap
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 6:45 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> How is this going to deal with VIVT caches?
Hrm. That's a good question. I'm not sure I totally have my head
around it but, I guess we could make sure to call
invalidate_kernel_vmap_range() in begin_cpu_access() and
flush_kernel_vmap_range() in end_cpu_access() rather then exiting out
early as we do now?
Unless you have better guidance?
Worse case we could check CONFIG_CPU_CACHE_VIVT and not register the
system-uncached heap.
thanks
-john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists