[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <cebd942fda19f9c39e0608aa6bd93af5e0b3639b.1599750901.git.anand.jain@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 18:59:49 +0800
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: wqu@...e.com, fdmanana@...e.com, dsterba@...e.com,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH stable-5.4 1/6] Btrfs: send, allow clone operations within the same file
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
commit 11f2069c113e02971b8db6fda62f9b9cd31a030f upstream.
For send we currently skip clone operations when the source and
destination files are the same. This is so because clone didn't support
this case in its early days, but support for it was added back in May
2013 by commit a96fbc72884fcb ("Btrfs: allow file data clone within a
file"). This change adds support for it.
Example:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt/sdd
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 64K 0 64K" /mnt/sdd/foobar
$ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdd/foobar 0 64K 64K" /mnt/sdd/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdd /mnt/sdd/snap
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sde
$ mount /dev/sde /mnt/sde
$ btrfs send /mnt/sdd/snap | btrfs receive /mnt/sde
Without this change file foobar at the destination has a single 128Kb
extent:
$ filefrag -v /mnt/sde/snap/foobar
Filesystem type is: 9123683e
File size of /mnt/sde/snap/foobar is 131072 (32 blocks of 4096 bytes)
ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags:
0: 0.. 31: 0.. 31: 32: last,unknown_loc,delalloc,eof
/mnt/sde/snap/foobar: 1 extent found
With this we get a single 64Kb extent that is shared at file offsets 0
and 64K, just like in the source filesystem:
$ filefrag -v /mnt/sde/snap/foobar
Filesystem type is: 9123683e
File size of /mnt/sde/snap/foobar is 131072 (32 blocks of 4096 bytes)
ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags:
0: 0.. 15: 3328.. 3343: 16: shared
1: 16.. 31: 3328.. 3343: 16: 3344: last,shared,eof
/mnt/sde/snap/foobar: 2 extents found
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>
---
fs/btrfs/send.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/send.c b/fs/btrfs/send.c
index 6ad216e8178e..48d028b1cfaf 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/send.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c
@@ -1257,12 +1257,20 @@ static int __iterate_backrefs(u64 ino, u64 offset, u64 root, void *ctx_)
*/
if (found->root == bctx->sctx->send_root) {
/*
- * TODO for the moment we don't accept clones from the inode
- * that is currently send. We may change this when
- * BTRFS_IOC_CLONE_RANGE supports cloning from and to the same
- * file.
+ * If the source inode was not yet processed we can't issue a
+ * clone operation, as the source extent does not exist yet at
+ * the destination of the stream.
*/
- if (ino >= bctx->cur_objectid)
+ if (ino > bctx->cur_objectid)
+ return 0;
+ /*
+ * We clone from the inode currently being sent as long as the
+ * source extent is already processed, otherwise we could try
+ * to clone from an extent that does not exist yet at the
+ * destination of the stream.
+ */
+ if (ino == bctx->cur_objectid &&
+ offset >= bctx->sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset)
return 0;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists