[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201008175951.GA9267@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 10:59:51 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: stsp <stsp2@...dex.ru>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] KVM: x86: KVM_SET_SREGS.CR4 bug fixes and cleanup
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 07:00:13PM +0300, stsp wrote:
> 07.10.2020 04:44, Sean Christopherson пишет:
> >Two bug fixes to handle KVM_SET_SREGS without a preceding KVM_SET_CPUID2.
> Hi Sean & KVM devs.
>
> I tested the patches, and wherever I
> set VMXE in CR4, I now get
> KVM: KVM_SET_SREGS: Invalid argument
> Before the patch I was able (with many
> problems, but still) to set VMXE sometimes.
>
> So its a NAK so far, waiting for an update. :)
IIRC, you said you were going to test on AMD? Assuming that's correct, -EINVAL
is the expected behavior. KVM was essentially lying before; it never actually
set CR4.VMXE in hardware, it just didn't properply detect the error and so VMXE
was set in KVM's shadow of the guest's CR4.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists