[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24c8ee4d-d5f7-e49f-cd0c-7cf50a5fd885@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 14:17:41 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
"open list:LIBATA SUBSYSTEM (Serial and Parallel ATA drivers)"
<linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org
Cc: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [ Regressions ] linux next 20201008: blk_update_request: I/O
error, dev sda, sector 0 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x800 phys_seg 0 prio class 0
On 10/8/20 2:05 PM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 at 23:41, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> There are two major regressions noticed on linux next tag 20201008.
>> I will bisect this problem and get back to you.
>
> Reverting scsi: patch set on linux next tag 20201008 fixed reported problems.
> git revert --no-edit 653eb7c99d84..ed7fb2d018fd
Just for everyones edification, that would be these 9 patches from the
SCSI tree:
Christoph Hellwig (9):
scsi: core: Don't export scsi_device_from_queue()
scsi: core: Remove scsi_init_cmd_errh
scsi: core: Move command size detection out of the fast path
scsi: core: Use rq_dma_dir in scsi_setup_cmnd()
scsi: core: Rename scsi_prep_state_check() to scsi_device_state_check()
scsi: core: Rename scsi_mq_prep_fn() to scsi_prepare_cmd()
scsi: core: Clean up allocation and freeing of sgtables
scsi: core: Remove scsi_setup_cmnd() and scsi_setup_fs_cmnd()
scsi: core: Only start the request just before dispatching
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists