[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201009205041.GA1448445@google.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 13:50:41 -0700
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Clang-Built-Linux ML <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/29] Add support for Clang LTO
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 06:30:24PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Will clang-cfi be based on this, too?
At least until the prerequisite patches are merged into mainline. In the
meanwhile, I have a CFI tree based on this series here:
https://github.com/samitolvanen/linux/tree/tip/clang-lto
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists