linux-kernel - [tip: perf/urgent] perf: Fix task_function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <160222467221.7002.13972544073695390160.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date:   Fri, 09 Oct 2020 06:24:32 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Kajol Jain" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Barret Rhoden <brho@...gle.com>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: perf/urgent] perf: Fix task_function_call() error handling

The following commit has been merged into the perf/urgent branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     6d6b8b9f4fceab7266ca03d194f60ec72bd4b654
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/6d6b8b9f4fceab7266ca03d194f60ec72bd4b654
Author:        Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
AuthorDate:    Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:17:32 +05:30
Committer:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 08:18:33 +02:00

perf: Fix task_function_call() error handling

The error handling introduced by commit:

  2ed6edd33a21 ("perf: Add cond_resched() to task_function_call()")

looses any return value from smp_call_function_single() that is not
{0, -EINVAL}. This is a problem because it will return -EXNIO when the
target CPU is offline. Worse, in that case it'll turn into an infinite
loop.

Fixes: 2ed6edd33a21 ("perf: Add cond_resched() to task_function_call()")
Reported-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200827064732.20860-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 7ed5248..e8bf922 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static void remote_function(void *data)
  * retry due to any failures in smp_call_function_single(), such as if the
  * task_cpu() goes offline concurrently.
  *
- * returns @func return value or -ESRCH when the process isn't running
+ * returns @func return value or -ESRCH or -ENXIO when the process isn't running
  */
 static int
 task_function_call(struct task_struct *p, remote_function_f func, void *info)
@@ -115,7 +115,8 @@ task_function_call(struct task_struct *p, remote_function_f func, void *info)
 	for (;;) {
 		ret = smp_call_function_single(task_cpu(p), remote_function,
 					       &data, 1);
-		ret = !ret ? data.ret : -EAGAIN;
+		if (!ret)
+			ret = data.ret;
 
 		if (ret != -EAGAIN)
 			break;