linux-kernel - [tip: core/rcu] docs: Fix typo in synchronize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <160222534661.7002.3876459463895026010.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date:   Fri, 09 Oct 2020 06:35:46 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Tobias Klauser" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: core/rcu] docs: Fix typo in synchronize_rcu() function name

The following commit has been merged into the core/rcu branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     77f808607a62c3685381a5732a88b30bad8893b5
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/77f808607a62c3685381a5732a88b30bad8893b5
Author:        Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
AuthorDate:    Thu, 02 Jul 2020 18:28:10 +02:00
Committer:     Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 14:29:16 -07:00

docs: Fix typo in synchronize_rcu() function name

s/sychronize_rcu/synchronize_rcu/

Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
 Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
index c7f147b..fb3ff76 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.rst
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ order to amortize their overhead over many uses of the corresponding APIs.
 
 There are at least three flavors of RCU usage in the Linux kernel. The diagram
 above shows the most common one. On the updater side, the rcu_assign_pointer(),
-sychronize_rcu() and call_rcu() primitives used are the same for all three
+synchronize_rcu() and call_rcu() primitives used are the same for all three
 flavors. However for protection (on the reader side), the primitives used vary
 depending on the flavor: