[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <160222533671.7002.15652338637485531444.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 06:35:36 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Madhuparna Bhowmik" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: core/rcu] kvm: mmu: page_track: Fix RCU list API usage
The following commit has been merged into the core/rcu branch of tip:
Commit-ID: df9a30fd1f70a757df193acd7396622eee23e527
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/df9a30fd1f70a757df193acd7396622eee23e527
Author: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@...il.com>
AuthorDate: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 18:40:03 +05:30
Committer: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:36:23 -07:00
kvm: mmu: page_track: Fix RCU list API usage
Use hlist_for_each_entry_srcu() instead of hlist_for_each_entry_rcu()
as it also checkes if the right lock is held.
Using hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() with a condition argument will not
report the cases where a SRCU protected list is traversed using
rcu_read_lock(). Hence, use hlist_for_each_entry_srcu().
Signed-off-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
index a84a141..8443a67 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.c
@@ -229,7 +229,8 @@ void kvm_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, const u8 *new,
return;
idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->track_srcu);
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node)
+ hlist_for_each_entry_srcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node,
+ srcu_read_lock_held(&head->track_srcu))
if (n->track_write)
n->track_write(vcpu, gpa, new, bytes, n);
srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
@@ -254,7 +255,8 @@ void kvm_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
return;
idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->track_srcu);
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node)
+ hlist_for_each_entry_srcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node,
+ srcu_read_lock_held(&head->track_srcu))
if (n->track_flush_slot)
n->track_flush_slot(kvm, slot, n);
srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists