lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b1c84287-867b-5884-8cb5-f9f433014622@leemhuis.info>
Date:   Fri, 9 Oct 2020 09:38:14 +0200
From:   Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 21/26] docs: reporting-bugs: details on writing and
 sending the report

Many thx for you comments. Consider all the obvious spelling and


grammatical mistakes you pointed out fixed, I won't mention all of them


in this reply to keep things easier to follow.

Am 09.10.20 um 04:45 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> On 10/1/20 1:39 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

>> +   In both cases make sure to inform those that the MAINTAINERS file lists in
>> +   the section 'security contact'. Ideally CCing them on the mail with the
>> +   report. If you filed it in a bug tracker forward the reports text, but on top
> 
> parse error in first 2 sentences above...

Now reads:

In both cases make sure to mail your report to the addresses the 
MAINTAINERS file lists in the section 'security contact'. Ideally 
directly CC them when sending the report by mail.

Ciao, Thorsten

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ