linux-kernel - Re: Stable backport request for fixing the issue of not being able to create a new pid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201009092336.GA415570@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Oct 2020 11:23:36 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Wen Yang <wenyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Stable backport request for fixing the issue of not being able
 to create a new pid_ns

On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 09:00:21PM +0800, Wen Yang wrote:
> After the process exits, the following three dentries still refer to the pid:
> /proc/<pid>
> /proc/<pid>/ns
> /proc/<pid>/ns/pid
> 
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208613
> 
> According to the commit f333c700c610 ("pidns: Add a limit on the number of
> pid namespaces"), if the pid cannot be released, it may result in the
> inability to create a new pid_ns.
> 
> Please backport the following patches to the kernel stable trees (from 4.9.y
> to 5.6.y):
> 7bc3e6e55acf ("proc: Use a list of inodes to flush from proc")
> 26dbc60f385f ("proc: Generalize proc_sys_prune_dcache into proc_prune_siblings_dcache")
> f90f3cafe8d5 ("proc: Use d_invalidate in proc_prune_siblings_dcache")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wenyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org

How well did you test these backports?  I see at least one fix for them
that you missed, odds are there might have been more.  Please verify
that the above list of patches _really_ is what you want to have
applied, and that you have tested it properly.

thanks,

greg k-h