linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: Enable perf events based hard lockup detector

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFA6WYPnmEjLo6832M_tXf7RwrpQwS0GBd5oZTuMS-oUkRPAyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:53:53 +0530
From:   Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
        acme@...nel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: Enable perf events based hard lockup detector

Hi Will, Alex,

On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 at 14:22, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> With the recent feature added to enable perf events to use pseudo NMIs
> as interrupts on platforms which support GICv3 or later, its now been
> possible to enable hard lockup detector (or NMI watchdog) on arm64
> platforms. So enable corresponding support.
>
> One thing to note here is that normally lockup detector is initialized
> just after the early initcalls but PMU on arm64 comes up much later as
> device_initcall(). So we need to re-initialize lockup detection once
> PMU has been initialized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
> ---
>

Are there any further comments on this patch? If we don't have any,
would it be possible to queue this patch for 5.10?

-Sumit

> Changes in v4:
> - Rebased to latest pmu v7 NMI patch-set [1] and in turn use "has_nmi"
>   hook to know if PMU IRQ has been requested as an NMI.
> - Add check for return value prior to initializing hard-lockup detector.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/9/24/458
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Rebased to latest pmu NMI patch-set [1].
> - Addressed misc. comments from Stephen.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/19/671
>
> Changes since RFC:
> - Rebased on top of Alex's WIP-pmu-nmi branch.
> - Add comment for safe max. CPU frequency.
> - Misc. cleanup.
>
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig             |  2 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c         |  5 +++++
>  include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h   |  2 ++
>  4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 6d23283..b5c2594 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -167,6 +167,8 @@ config ARM64
>         select HAVE_NMI
>         select HAVE_PATA_PLATFORM
>         select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
> +       select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS_NMI if ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI
> +       select HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF if PERF_EVENTS && HAVE_PERF_EVENTS_NMI
>         select HAVE_PERF_REGS
>         select HAVE_PERF_USER_STACK_DUMP
>         select HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> index ef206fb..6ad5120 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/sched_clock.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
> +#include <linux/nmi.h>
> +#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
>
>  /* ARMv8 Cortex-A53 specific event types. */
>  #define ARMV8_A53_PERFCTR_PREF_LINEFILL                                0xC2
> @@ -1224,10 +1226,21 @@ static struct platform_driver armv8_pmu_driver = {
>
>  static int __init armv8_pmu_driver_init(void)
>  {
> +       int ret;
> +
>         if (acpi_disabled)
> -               return platform_driver_register(&armv8_pmu_driver);
> +               ret = platform_driver_register(&armv8_pmu_driver);
>         else
> -               return arm_pmu_acpi_probe(armv8_pmuv3_init);
> +               ret = arm_pmu_acpi_probe(armv8_pmuv3_init);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Try to re-initialize lockup detector after PMU init in
> +        * case PMU events are triggered via NMIs.
> +        */
> +       if (ret == 0 && arm_pmu_irq_is_nmi())
> +               lockup_detector_init();
> +
> +       return ret;
>  }
>  device_initcall(armv8_pmu_driver_init)
>
> @@ -1285,3 +1298,27 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event,
>         userpg->cap_user_time_zero = 1;
>         userpg->cap_user_time_short = 1;
>  }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF
> +/*
> + * Safe maximum CPU frequency in case a particular platform doesn't implement
> + * cpufreq driver. Although, architecture doesn't put any restrictions on
> + * maximum frequency but 5 GHz seems to be safe maximum given the available
> + * Arm CPUs in the market which are clocked much less than 5 GHz. On the other
> + * hand, we can't make it much higher as it would lead to a large hard-lockup
> + * detection timeout on parts which are running slower (eg. 1GHz on
> + * Developerbox) and doesn't possess a cpufreq driver.
> + */
> +#define SAFE_MAX_CPU_FREQ      5000000000UL // 5 GHz
> +u64 hw_nmi_get_sample_period(int watchdog_thresh)
> +{
> +       unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +       unsigned long max_cpu_freq;
> +
> +       max_cpu_freq = cpufreq_get_hw_max_freq(cpu) * 1000UL;
> +       if (!max_cpu_freq)
> +               max_cpu_freq = SAFE_MAX_CPU_FREQ;
> +
> +       return (u64)max_cpu_freq * watchdog_thresh;
> +}
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> index cb2f55f..794a37d 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> @@ -726,6 +726,11 @@ static int armpmu_get_cpu_irq(struct arm_pmu *pmu, int cpu)
>         return per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu);
>  }
>
> +bool arm_pmu_irq_is_nmi(void)
> +{
> +       return has_nmi;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * PMU hardware loses all context when a CPU goes offline.
>   * When a CPU is hotplugged back in, since some hardware registers are
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> index 5b616dd..5765069 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ int arm_pmu_acpi_probe(armpmu_init_fn init_fn);
>  static inline int arm_pmu_acpi_probe(armpmu_init_fn init_fn) { return 0; }
>  #endif
>
> +bool arm_pmu_irq_is_nmi(void);
> +
>  /* Internal functions only for core arm_pmu code */
>  struct arm_pmu *armpmu_alloc(void);
>  struct arm_pmu *armpmu_alloc_atomic(void);
> --
> 2.7.4
>