[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a98a77a-a507-954a-f2ec-e38af18c168f@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 14:10:49 +0300
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+77efce558b2b9e6b6405@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
axboe@...nel.dk, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in __io_uring_files_cancel
On 09/10/2020 11:02, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit: e4fb79c7 Add linux-next specific files for 20201008
> git tree: linux-next
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1592ee1b900000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=568d41fe4341ed0f
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=77efce558b2b9e6b6405
> compiler: gcc (GCC) 10.1.0-syz 20200507
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+77efce558b2b9e6b6405@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in xas_next_entry include/linux/xarray.h:1630 [inline]
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __io_uring_files_cancel+0x417/0x440 fs/io_uring.c:8681
> Read of size 1 at addr ffff888033631880 by task syz-executor.1/8477
>
> CPU: 1 PID: 8477 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc8-next-20201008-syzkaller #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
> dump_stack+0x198/0x1fb lib/dump_stack.c:118
> print_address_description.constprop.0.cold+0xae/0x497 mm/kasan/report.c:385
> __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:545 [inline]
> kasan_report.cold+0x1f/0x37 mm/kasan/report.c:562
> xas_next_entry include/linux/xarray.h:1630 [inline]
> __io_uring_files_cancel+0x417/0x440 fs/io_uring.c:8681
> io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:35 [inline]
> exit_files+0xe4/0x170 fs/file.c:456
> do_exit+0xae9/0x2930 kernel/exit.c:801
> do_group_exit+0x125/0x310 kernel/exit.c:903
> get_signal+0x428/0x1f00 kernel/signal.c:2757
> arch_do_signal+0x82/0x2470 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:811
> exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:161 [inline]
> exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x194/0x1f0 kernel/entry/common.c:192
> syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x7a/0x2c0 kernel/entry/common.c:267
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
It seems this fails on "node->shift" in xas_next_entry(), that would
mean that the node itself was freed while we're iterating on it.
__io_uring_files_cancel() iterates with xas_next_entry() and creates
XA_STATE once by hand, but it also removes entries in the loop with
io_uring_del_task_file() -> xas_store(&xas, NULL); without updating
the iterating XA_STATE. Could it be the problem? See a diff below
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 824ed4e01562..356313c7aec2 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -8617,10 +8617,9 @@ static int io_uring_add_task_file(struct file *file)
/*
* Remove this io_uring_file -> task mapping.
*/
-static void io_uring_del_task_file(struct file *file)
+static void io_uring_del_task_file(struct file *file, struct xa_state *xas)
{
struct io_uring_task *tctx = current->io_uring;
- XA_STATE(xas, &tctx->xa, (unsigned long) file);
if (tctx->last == file)
tctx->last = NULL;
@@ -8643,7 +8642,7 @@ static void __io_uring_attempt_task_drop(struct file *file)
rcu_read_unlock();
if (old == file)
- io_uring_del_task_file(file);
+ io_uring_del_task_file(file, &xas);
}
/*
@@ -8687,7 +8686,7 @@ void __io_uring_files_cancel(struct files_struct *files)
io_uring_cancel_task_requests(ctx, files);
if (files)
- io_uring_del_task_file(file);
+ io_uring_del_task_file(file, &xas);
} while (1);
}
--
Pavel Begunkov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists